15 Contemporary Cars That Didn’t Quite Hit the Mark
There’s more to the car business than nitro power and V8 engines. Aligning vehicle design with customer expectations is something that’s not discussed enough. Automakers sometimes miss the mark, resulting in vehicles that face harsh criticism, recalls, and discontinuations. Here are 15 cars over the last two decades that fell below the mark
Vinfast VF8 (2021–present)
Reports indicate frequent software glitches affecting this car’s essential functions, such as navigation and infotainment systems. The car’s build quality has been criticized, with complaints about the fit and finish of interior materials. Additionally, the VF8’s electric range falls short of competitors, disappointing eco-conscious buyers. Despite VinFast’s environmental-friendliness efforts to break into the international market, these problems have significantly hindered its reputation and sales performance.
Nissan Juke (First Generation) (2010–2019)
Although the Nissan Juke maintained a niche market due to its unique design and small crossover appeal, the car’s unconventional styling polarized consumers, with many criticizing its appearance. Interior quality and space were often highlighted as significant drawbacks, featuring cramped quarters and low-grade materials. Reliability issues plagued the Juke, leading to recalls for turbocharger and timing chain problems. Handling could also have been better.
Aston Martin Cygnet (2011–2013)
Discontinued after two years, the Aston Martin Cygnet lacked several typical features expected from the brand, including powerful engines, luxurious interiors, advanced infotainment systems, and bespoke craftsmanship that define Aston Martin cars. Instead, the Cygnet, essentially a rebadged Toyota iQ, is disappointing with its basic interior and limited engine power. Doug DeMuro dubbed it “the most ridiculous exotic car ever,” and Top Gear included it in its “Fail of the century” series, criticizing it as a cynical exercise in badge engineering aimed at lowering Aston’s average fleet emissions.
Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet (2011–2014)
A staff from Motor Trend called the Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet “the most stupid vehicle of 2011,” criticizing its structural rigidity, ride height, styling, efficiency, practicality, and purpose. Combining SUV elements with a convertible design resulted in an impractical and awkward vehicle. The convertible top added weight, negatively impacting performance and handling. Additionally, the high price tag also needed to align with the quality or features offered, leading to poor sales and eventual discontinuation.
Mitsubishi Mirage (Sixth Generation) (2012–present)
Consumer Reports placed the Mitsubishi Mirage among the 10 Worst Cars of 2013 due to criticism of its clumsy handling and interior quality reminiscent of early 1980s standards. The car has been widely panned for its poor build quality, underpowered engine, and lackluster performance. Cheap interior materials and excessive road noise further detract from the driving experience. Regardless of its supposed budget-friendliness, the Mirage’s minimal features and low safety ratings fail to justify the cost.
Fisker Karma (2011–12) and Karma Revero (2017–present)
Designed by Henrik Fisker, who designed notable cars such as the BMW Z8, Aston Martin DB9, and Aston Martin V8 Vantage, the Fisker Karma and its successor, the Karma Revero, were met with mixed reviews. While the exterior design received positive comments, the Fisker Karma suffered significant reliability issues, including battery problems and frequent recalls. The Karma Revero, although improved, still faces criticism for high costs, limited electric range, and ongoing reliability concerns. Bloomberg News criticized Revero for poor driving dynamics and false promises by the brand, further tarnishing its reputation.
Pontiac Aztek (2001–05)
Former General Motors executive Bob Lutz said the Pontiac Aztek resembled an “angry kitchen appliance.” The vehicle became infamous for its unattractive and unconventional design, overshadowing its innovative features and spacious interior. In spite of efforts to market the Aztek’s versatility, consumers and critics were unimpressed. Alex Taylor III’s book, “Sixty to Zero,” which chronicles the decline of General Motors, features the Pontiac Aztek prominently on its cover.
Hummer H2 (2002–09)
The Hummer H2 faced significant criticism for its excessive size, poor fuel efficiency, and lack of practicality. Its massive footprint and high fuel consumption made it an unpopular choice during a time of increasing environmental awareness. Critics also highlighted its unwieldy handling and limited off-road capability compared to its military-inspired predecessor. This car symbolized automotive excess and poor environmental stewardship, with Popular Mechanics criticizing General Motor’s “political incorrectness at a time when political correctness was winning.”
Jaguar X-Type (2001–09)
Lack of originality and poor build quality were among the issues that came up with the car, as it shared many components with the Ford Mondeo. ‘Car and Driver’ noted severe reliability issues, stating, “Engines seized, interiors collapsed, transmissions exploded, and driveshafts ate U-joints.” These problems and subpar performance tarnished its reputation, leading to disappointing sales and eventual discontinuation.
Lincoln Blackwood (2002)
Reviewers criticized the Lincoln Blackwood for its lack of utility and off-road capability, highlighting its impractical carpeted cargo bed and minimal functionality. Despite being marketed as a luxury truck, its high price tag and poor fuel economy did not meet consumer expectations. The Blackwood was a commercial failure, leading to withdrawal from the market in a year, with the remaining inventory taking two more years to sell off. Its brief stint in the market was marked by widespread criticism and disappointing sales.
Renault Avantime (2002–03)
Described by Craig Cheetham in his book ‘World’s Worst Cars’ as “doomed to failure by its very concept,” the Renault Avantime faced significant challenges. Its unconventional blend of coupe and minivan failed to resonate with consumers. The car’s large size and unique styling were unappealing, with particular complaints about its insufficient rear legroom. Additionally, its high price and limited practicality further hindered its success. As a result, Renault discontinued Avantime after just two years.
Renault Vel Satis (2002–09)
An oddly designed four-door hatchback limousine—the Renault Vel Satis, was praised for its high comfort level. However, its road handling was considered poor, and its design was often ridiculed. Designer Patrick Le Quément focused more on presence than elegance, which did not resonate with many consumers. Notwithstanding its comfort, the vehicle’s unconventional styling and unimpressive performance led to disappointing sales and eventual discontinuation.
Rover CityRover (2003–05)
After Rover refused to lend a CityRover to Top Gear for testing, James May went undercover. He test-drove one at a dealer while carrying a hidden camera, giving a verdict that said it was the worst car he had ever driven. It faced significant criticism for its poor build quality and high price, and even though it was being marketed as a budget-friendly city car, it was overpriced compared to better-equipped rivals.
Chevrolet SSR (2003–06)
In ‘Car and Driver’s words, “It’s part convertible, part pickup, and part car—a blend that failed to captivate American consumers who rejected its corporate take on hot-rod culture.” The Chevrolet SSR left most people indifferent, and its unique retro styling couldn’t save it either, as it faced criticism for its high price and mediocre performance. Its heavy weight and limited practicality as a pickup truck further reduced its appeal.
Saturn Ion (2003–07)
Particularly notable for its awkward and unresponsive steering, the Saturn Ion faced significant criticism. Its noisy, underpowered engine and low-quality interior materials further detracted from the driving experience. The unconventional center-mounted instrument cluster was deemed impractical and distracting. Even with efforts to appeal to younger buyers, these shortcomings led to disappointing sales and the car’s eventual discontinuation.